An energy management system holds the consumption record for every meter in the portfolio, and every invoice and report reads from it. So we build it as one system in parts, and each part has to hold up on the day a reporting deadline lands.
Interval data arrives from different meters at different resolutions, and a communications gap looks identical to a genuine zero. We build the ingestion layer with the gap handling rules, so a dropped gateway on one riser doesn't turn into a building that apparently used no electricity on Tuesday.
A supplier invoice and your own meter data disagree more often than anyone expects, and the difference is usually where recoverable money sits. So we build the bill parsing together with the variance checks, so a tariff applied to the wrong account surfaces in the month it happens.
Plant data lives in the BMS and speaks BACnet or Modbus, and the point names were written by whoever commissioned the site. ELITEX build the point mapping along with the polling layer, since a normalised tag set is what makes one chiller comparable to another across the portfolio.
Submeter readings turn into tenant charges, and a lease clause decides how. We build the allocation rules with the billing export, so a recovery calculation survives the first tenant who asks to see the working.
A setpoint drifts on a Friday and the site runs in override until someone walks past the panel. We build the rule engine together with the escalation logic, so an alert reaches the person who can act on it and doesn't land in a shared inbox nobody reads.
Consumption data has to leave the system in the shape a benchmarking scheme or a lender expects, and weather normalisation changes the number. We build the reporting pipeline with an audit trail behind every figure, so a challenged submission traces back to raw readings.
Energy management software development by ELITEX works best for real estate operators whose consumption data now lives in a spreadsheet that one person understands. An owner running a few hundred assets across offices and retail fits well. So does a manager whose licensed platform can't model a tenant recharge structure the finance team keeps making more specific. We're the wrong choice if you want a monitoring platform configured next week, because we write custom code and don't sell a product. We're also a poor fit for someone with four buildings on a single supplier, since an off the shelf tool will cover that far cheaper than we will.
Most of our engineers are senior level, and that shows up in the meter hierarchy decided in the first month. Time series assumptions punish junior code in ways that only appear when the annual figures get compiled.
We've spent long enough in this vertical to know how utility APIs and BMS exports behave when they misbehave. That knowledge saves discovery time you'd otherwise pay for.
Code, repositories, infrastructure, and environments sit in your accounts from the first commit. No lock in, and no licence tying you to us after launch.
If your scope doesn't fit your budget, you hear it during discovery. We'd take a smaller project over a rebuild conversation in month six.
Clutch Review
What Our Clients Say About Us
We settle the meter hierarchy and the time series model before any dashboard gets written, since both are the hardest things to change once years of readings exist. Alerting and tenant billing come after the data holds through a full billing cycle.
Many of our clients have outgrown a hosted monitoring product and need the same analysis running on software they control. So ELITEX rebuild the meter store and the calculation rules on an owned stack, matching current behaviour first and improving it second.
An accounting system and an energy platform rarely agree on what counts as a billable unit of consumption, and that disagreement surfaces as a recharge that drifts away from the invoice. We build the translation layer that reconciles those definitions, including the cases where one system has closed a period while the other is still backfilling readings.
In case of migration, we map historical readings and meter registers onto the new schema, then reconcile both datasets before anyone switches the old platform off. Parallel running through a full billing cycle catches what the mapping missed.
In this scenario, the system stays, and one piece of it gets built or replaced. Tenant recharge calculation and emissions reporting tend to be the modules clients want written to their own operational rules.
Someone has to handle the utility provider that changes its data format without warning. That's why ELITEX keep the integrations current and stay available when a gateway drops out mid reporting period.
When a system has no documented API, we build the connector ourselves. Screen level integrations and file based feeds are both workable, and we've done both.
Arcadia, UtilityAPI, Urjanet, Genability, Octopus Energy API
Siemens Desigo, Johnson Controls Metasys, Honeywell EBI, Schneider EcoStruxure, Tridium Niagara
AWS IoT Core, Azure IoT Hub, The Things Stack, Wattsense, Smappee
QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, NetSuite, Yardi Voyager
Still have a question?
Reach out to our specialist!
Drop us a line! We would love to hear from you.


